Nigerian Politics

Topics: Editorial cartoon, Editorial cartoonist, Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy Pages: 30 (5938 words) Published: April 9, 2013
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies

Volume: 2 – Issue: 3 – July - 2012

The Role of Humor in the Construction of Satire in Nigerian Political Cartoons

Sani, I., Abdullah, M.H., Ali, A.M. and Abdullah, F.S

Department of English, Faculty of Modern Languages and Communications,

University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia


The communicative functions of humor and its visual power have made political

cartoons an interesting research field across academic disciplines. The first decade

of the Millennium has witnessed a considerable research on editorial cartoons. This


constituted a genuine genre within media discourse. Cartoons are used to express

opinions,| construct| valuable| arguments| and| provide| specific| knowledge on| contemporary| social| issues.| The goal| of| the| genre| is| to| provide political| commentary,| address| crucial| issues| and| criticize| political| leaders and| their| contemptible| practices| in an artful fashion. In a nutshell, the genre serves as a| medium| of| political| reporting articulating a particular message from a particular| point of| view using| language as| its| prime tool.| Given their| contents| mostly|

expressed through visual illustrations, political cartoons are best understood through

investigation of incorporated visual rhetoric. This paper| aims at unfolding the nature| and function of humor in Nigerian political cartoons| using theoretical perspectives|

of humor as method of analysis. To this end, content analysis was used to sort out

contentsof the cartoons. 35 cartoons texts were extracted from the two most

prominentNigerian newspapers namely: Vanguard and Daily Trust. The findings

indicatedthat cartoonists use humor in Nigerian political cartoons to relive

audiences of stressful situations and persuade them towards making opinion on contemporary issues in society. More specifically, Nigerian cartoonists manipulate

aggressive and affliative humor styles purposely to construct criticisms| pointed| to| political leaders and| comment on current socio-political issues of the| moment| in| order to initiate social and political reforms.| | |

Keywords: political| cartoons, visual rhetoric, humor, Millennium, media,| discourse, genre| | | |
| © Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies| 148| |

Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies

Volume: 2 – Issue: 3 – July - 2012

Introduction| | | |
Political cartoons are an effective| means| for cartoonists to express their| thoughts| and ideas about the issues or events in| a particular period in a playful manner| (Becker, 1959). Basically the political| cartoons genre has gained considerable| research in academics considering| their potentials of expressing opinion| succinctly|

in such a way that thousand words cannot provide at a moment providing specific

knowledge on| current| events in| society (Peñamarin, 1998). Previous research| on| political cartoons has focused| on| their nature and functions. For instance, Streicher| (1965 as cited in (Benoit, Klyukovski, McHale, & Airne, 2001) explored| the| communicative| function| of| political cartoons; Morrison (1969) investigated| the|

unique features of political cartoons; Medhurst & DeSousa, (1981) focused on the

rhetorical form of political cartoons; Cahn| (1984) studied political cartoons as tools| for communications; (Bormann et al.,| 1978)...

References: Apte, M. L. (1985). Humor and laughter: An anthropological approach. Cornell university press.
Attardo, S. (1993). Violation of conversational maxims and cooperation: the case of jokes.
Becker, & Stephen. (1959). Comic Art in America. Simon & Schuster.
Bell, N. D. (2002). Using and understanding humor in a second language: A case study. Benoit, W. L., Klyukovski, A., McHale, J., & Airne, D. (2001). A fantasy theme analysis of
political cartoons on the Clinton-Lewinsky-Starr affair
Bergen, B. (2004). To awaken a sleeping giant. Cognition and culture in September 11 political cartoons. Language, Culture and Mind. Standford, CA: CSLI, 23–35.
Bormann, E. G., Koester, J., & Bennett, J. (1978). Political cartoons and salient rhetorical fantasies: An empirical analysis of the’76 presidential campaign. Communication Monographs, 45(4), 317–329.
Cahn, D. (1984). The political cartoon as communication. Media Development, 4, 39–42. Conners, J. L. (2007). Popular culture in political cartoons: Analyzing cartoonist approaches.
Delporte, c. (1995). Images of French-French war: caricature at a time of Dreyfus affair.
Edwards, J. L. (1997). Political cartoons in the 1988 presidential campaign: Image, metaphor, and narrative. Routledge.
Edwards, J. L., & Ware, L. (2005). Representing the Public in Campaign Media. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(3), 466.
Eko, L. (2007). It’s a Political Jungle Out There. International Communication Gazette,
69(3), 219.
El Refaie, E. (2009). Multiliteracies: how readers interpret political cartoons. Visual Communication, 8(2), 181.
El Refaie, E., & Hörschelmann, K. (2010). Young people’s readings of a political cartoon and the concept of multimodal literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(2), 195–207.
Feldman, O. (1995). Political reality and editorial cartoons in Japan: how the national dailies illustrate the japanese Prime Minister. JOURNALISM QUARTERLY, 72, 571–571.
Handl, H. (1990). Streotypication in mass media: The case of political caricature in Australian daily newspapers. Angewandte-sozialforschung, 16(1-2), 101-107.
James, D. L. (2001). split a gut and learn: Theory and research. Oakaland: Farmington Hills, MI: Oakaland Community College (ERIC Document.
Janes, L. M., & Olson, J. M. (2000). Jeer pressure: The behavioral effects of observing ridicule of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(4), 474.
Kulkarni, K. (2004). Billionaires for Bush: Parody as Political Intervention. emisférica, Journal of the Hemispheric Institute for Performance and Politics, 1.
Lynch, O. H. (2002). Humorous communication: Finding a place for humor in communication research. Communication Theory, 12(4), 423–445.
Mazid, B. E. . (2008). Cowboy and misanthrope: a critical (discourse) analysis of Bush and bin Laden cartoons. Discourse & Communication, 2(4), 433.
Medhurst, M. J., & DeSousa, M. A. (1981). Political cartoons as rhetorical forms: A taxonomy of graphic discourse. Communication Monographs.
Meyer, J. C. (2000). Humor as a Double-Edged Sword: Four Functions of Humor in Communication. Communication Theory, 10(3), 310–331.
Morris, R. (1993). Visual rhetoric in political cartoons: A structuralist approach. Metaphor and Symbol, 8(3), 195–210.
Morrison, M. C. (1969). The role of the political cartoonist in image making. Communication Studies, 20(4), 252–260.
Peñamarin, C. (1998). Polemic images: Metaphor and index in the language of political cartoons. Quaderni di studi semiotici.
Refaie, E. E. (2003). Understanding visual metaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons.
Robinson, J. (1981). The 1970s, best political cartoons of the decade. McGraw-Hill Companies.
Ruch, W. (1996). Measurement approaches to the sense of humor: Introduction and overview. Humor-International Journal of Humor Research, 9(3-4), 239–250.
Samson, A. C., & Huber, O. (2007). The interaction of cartoonist’s gender and formal features of cartoons. Humor-International Journal of Humor Research, 20(1), 1–25.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Politics Essay
  • Effects of internet in Politics Essay
  • Criminalisation of Politics Essay
  • Essay on Student Politics
  • Politics and Power Essay
  • Politics and Ethics Essay
  • Religion and Politics Essay
  • criminalisation of politics Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free
Jayam Raviyudan Deepavali- Vijay tv Diwali Special... | Bigiotteria | New York Cops – NYPD Blue